Re: Cleveland Cavaliers
Posted: Sun Jun 02, 2013 12:03 pm
Terry Pluto wants Ben McLemore:
About the Cavaliers...
Kansas freshman Ben McLemore clearly has the greatest offensive skills of those players expected to go at the top of the June 27 NBA Draft. So why not choose him?AP file
Should the Cavs take Nerlens Noel at No. 1? I'm not sure. Not at all.
Most fans know about Noel's ACL injury, which ended his freshman season at Kentucky in February. They know he weighed only 206 pounds at the NBA combine, a major concern for a 6-11 shot-blocking center. The weight doesn't bother me. He won't be 20 until next April, and he will add weight and he may even still be growing.
Defensively, he can become a monster. He not only blocked 4.4 shots per game, he also averaged 2.1 steals. He can run and jump. His offense is raw, but it will improve because he is so young and has a solid work ethic.
But the knee is a concern -- especially since it's the second injury. Noel missed most of his sophomore season in high school with an injury to the growth plate in his left knee. That makes me nervous.
Because of that, I'm wondering, "Should the Cavs should make Ben McLemore the top pick?" The 6-5 guard from Kansas may be the best scorer in the draft.
Consider this:
1. They really liked Bradley Beal in 2012, but he went No. 3 to Washington. They took Dion Waiters at No. 4.
2. Many teams -- including the Cavs -- believe McLemore is a superior shooter and scorer than Beal, who shot .445 from the field at Florida. McLemore was .495 at Kansas. On 3-pointers, it was .339 for Beal, .420 for McLemore.
3. Beal averaged 13.9 points and shot .410 (.386 on 3-pointers) as a rookie for Washington. Waiters averaged 14.7 points and shot .412 (.310 on 3-pointers).
4. Yes, the Cavs need a small forward, and Otto Porter is the best one in the draft. But not many teams project Porter to become an impact player. He does a lot of things reasonably well, and especially is effective moving without the ball. But do you take Porter over Noel's defensive presence or McLemore's scoring? I doubt the Cavs will do that.
5. McLemore is 6-4 and averaged 5.2 rebounds per game in the backcourt. That's a sign of athleticism. He is a pure shooting guard. I wish he'd drive more (3.7 attempts per game), especially because he was .870 at the foul line.
6. McLemore attended three high schools. He was a redshirt at Kansas, putting his academics in order. His college coaches wished he'd be more aggressive looking for his shot.
7. With Waiters and Kyrie Irving in the backcourt, why take McLemore? If he is the most talented player, you take him. Waiters becomes the sixth man, a role he played at Syracuse and briefly last season. Waiters can play either guard spot. Irving does get hurt, so the Cavs have real depth at guard.
8. They can sign (or more likely trade for) a veteran small forward who can score. They have the cap room. Suppose a team wants a young player in a deal? They would have Waiters available to trade.
About the Cavaliers...
Kansas freshman Ben McLemore clearly has the greatest offensive skills of those players expected to go at the top of the June 27 NBA Draft. So why not choose him?AP file
Should the Cavs take Nerlens Noel at No. 1? I'm not sure. Not at all.
Most fans know about Noel's ACL injury, which ended his freshman season at Kentucky in February. They know he weighed only 206 pounds at the NBA combine, a major concern for a 6-11 shot-blocking center. The weight doesn't bother me. He won't be 20 until next April, and he will add weight and he may even still be growing.
Defensively, he can become a monster. He not only blocked 4.4 shots per game, he also averaged 2.1 steals. He can run and jump. His offense is raw, but it will improve because he is so young and has a solid work ethic.
But the knee is a concern -- especially since it's the second injury. Noel missed most of his sophomore season in high school with an injury to the growth plate in his left knee. That makes me nervous.
Because of that, I'm wondering, "Should the Cavs should make Ben McLemore the top pick?" The 6-5 guard from Kansas may be the best scorer in the draft.
Consider this:
1. They really liked Bradley Beal in 2012, but he went No. 3 to Washington. They took Dion Waiters at No. 4.
2. Many teams -- including the Cavs -- believe McLemore is a superior shooter and scorer than Beal, who shot .445 from the field at Florida. McLemore was .495 at Kansas. On 3-pointers, it was .339 for Beal, .420 for McLemore.
3. Beal averaged 13.9 points and shot .410 (.386 on 3-pointers) as a rookie for Washington. Waiters averaged 14.7 points and shot .412 (.310 on 3-pointers).
4. Yes, the Cavs need a small forward, and Otto Porter is the best one in the draft. But not many teams project Porter to become an impact player. He does a lot of things reasonably well, and especially is effective moving without the ball. But do you take Porter over Noel's defensive presence or McLemore's scoring? I doubt the Cavs will do that.
5. McLemore is 6-4 and averaged 5.2 rebounds per game in the backcourt. That's a sign of athleticism. He is a pure shooting guard. I wish he'd drive more (3.7 attempts per game), especially because he was .870 at the foul line.
6. McLemore attended three high schools. He was a redshirt at Kansas, putting his academics in order. His college coaches wished he'd be more aggressive looking for his shot.
7. With Waiters and Kyrie Irving in the backcourt, why take McLemore? If he is the most talented player, you take him. Waiters becomes the sixth man, a role he played at Syracuse and briefly last season. Waiters can play either guard spot. Irving does get hurt, so the Cavs have real depth at guard.
8. They can sign (or more likely trade for) a veteran small forward who can score. They have the cap room. Suppose a team wants a young player in a deal? They would have Waiters available to trade.