Re: Cleveland Cavaliers
511Rusty did you read above and if so link or did you hear it on a chat and if so link.
I hear this argument a lot in the national media--that the Cavaliers blew it by not getting anything for James. But it's real easy to say that now, when we know the Cavs didn't win a title with him, and when we know he didn't end up coming back. People act like both of those were completely predictable ahead of time, but obviously they weren't. And I would imagine you can't find a single case in the history of sports where a team that was a legitimate championship contender traded its best player just because he was an impending free agent.rusty2 wrote: Never would have happened. The franchise lost almost half of its value in one day. Gilbert had to play it exactly as he did.
As to amnesty. A lot of players will be available to the top teams. Gilbert does not want to be paying players for those teams. Miami desperately wants a point guard.
I would not ignore if my antivirus had a warning. My norton did warn me when it was hacked. Not now. They did tweet a new address that day and I did use it. Maybe that updated my browser.kenm wrote:so you would ignore the warning when you click on the site?